Subject	BTW it's called a "GT" not a "GT40" (n/m)
Posted by	Luke@tirerack on March 08, 2004 at 9:52 AM
	This message has been viewed 24 times.
In Reply To	SZR: Taking on Ford GT40 posted by iam2secc4u on March 08, 2004 at 09:46 AM
Message
Follow Ups	SZR: Taking on Ford GT40 - iam2secc4u 09:46:44 03/08/04 BTW it's called a "GT" not a "GT40" (n/m) - Luke@tirerack 09:52:32 03/08/04 i am sorry.. the older version was called GT40 - iam2secc4u 09:56:15 03/08/04 linear torque and about 14 years of advancement - genic 09:58:21 03/08/04 i'd take the 140k ford if I had the dough - Nadir(Detroit) 10:31:41 03/08/04 exactly my point. IF you had the 140..it wouldnt be a ford - genic 10:38:12 03/08/04 I saw a callaway C12 this weekend. (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 10:58:25 03/08/04 double snaps to you ! (n/m) - genic 11:02:28 03/08/04 Really!!! thanks man, I appreciate that!! (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 11:10:16 03/08/04 sure thang buddy. cause YOU are the one i want to work with! - genic 11:13:13 03/08/04 Yeah, the Koenigsegg is pretty awesome! - FCV94TTZ 11:40:58 03/08/04 So hp/weight is the only deciding factor in performance? (n/m) - Kenny 10:04:21 03/08/04 dont know.. thats why i put it out to TT guru's - iam2secc4u 10:10:31 03/08/04 The original was amazing and the new one should be amazing - Technomancer 10:18:43 03/08/04 I dont like it: - therin (Plum) 10:27:30 03/08/04 Road Course Comparo.... - FCV94TTZ 11:14:59 03/08/04 Definetly a TT zo6, yum. (n/m) - Chaaarmndr (NoVa) 11:35:48 03/08/04 Not a chance, that car is bad ass, and if - JayTTZ 14:04:05 03/08/04
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.